|
 Wild Coconuts
& Antonio Pigafetta
|
After promoting my web page Coco Loco shamelessly to all and
sundry, including, very presumptuously, Hugh
Harries, author of Coconut Timeline and many
important scientific papers, and probably the world's foremost expert on
coconuts, I received a strange request from
him. He asked me if I could, sometime, just pop across from my
island to Suluan, the first island where
Ferdinand Magellan struck land in the
Philippines, described by Magellan's amanuensis, Antonio Pigafetta, as
'teeming with coconuts', and see if I could find some wild
ones.
On a world map, Suluan is
only within spitting distance of my Philippine island, Siargao - about 100
miles, as the tuna swims.
I had to let him down gently. There
was no way that I would risk my own 25 ft pumpboat directly to Suluan, straight north along the Philippines'
continental shelf edge, right into the typhoon belt. Relying on its
old and very badly-maintained 14hp motor, I might find myself washed
up in Fiji or Los Angeles (without health insurance?) half a year
later.
The
alternative was to take a 2 day launch and ferry trip to Cebu City,
another full day ferry/bus trip to Tacloban in Leyte, an overnight
ferry to Guiuan in Samar, perhaps a jeepney to the end of Samar, and
hope I could pick up a boat to Suluan.
Five days there, and who knows how much time back? No
way.
All Magellan had to do to hit my island instead
of Suluan was tack a couple of degrees more to port.
Perhaps, I replied, I might find some
primordial wild coconuts in my own island, Siargao. (Got
to placate him somehow).
Well, I did.
Source: www.multimap.com
Back
to Top
But first, let's see what Antonio
Pigafetta had to say about coconuts, 500 years ago.
|
| Pigafetta's account of
coconuts was one of the first to be read in the Western
world.
"In March 1521, after escaping the
thieves in the place they christened Ladrones
Island (Guam, much the same now as it was then - RP),
they (Magellan & his scurvy
crew) sailed toward Samar and
anchored on an island south of Samar
called Suluan.
Magellan
ordered tents set up by the beach. While they were resting there and
fetching fresh water, a boat with nine men on board arrived.
Magellan offered food and drink to the men who were ornately dressed
and later presented some fabulous (to him) gifts to what he presumed
were heathen primitive natives. The gifts consisted of red caps,
mirrors, combs, bells and other trinkets. In return, the men gave
Magellan fish, a jar (earthenware or perhaps even Oriental ceramic
vessel) with palm wine they called “vraca” and bananas which Pigafetta, who was seeing them for
the first time, described as "figs more than a foot long."
(Probably the local variety of cooking plantains - tinduk -
RP). They were also given smaller better-tasting bananas and two
coconuts.
Due to the language barrier, the men spoke in sign language
and made it understood that they would return in four days with
rice, other types of food, and, again, coconuts. So Pigafetta
describes the coconut and its uses in great detail:
"...Just as we have bread,
wine, oil and vinegar in their several kinds, these people have the
aforesaid things which come only from the palm trees. Wine is obtained from these in the following
manner. They make an aperture into the heart of the tree at its top
which is called palmito, from which is distilled along the tree a
liquor like white must, which is sweet with a touch of greenness.
Then they take canes as thick as a man's leg, by which they draw off
this liquor, fastening them to the tree from the evening until next
morning, and from morning to the evening so that the said liquor
comes little by little.
This mananggutay (tuba gatherer)
is doing exactly the same as Pigafetta described 500 years
ago. The only Western professions
so consistent in practice for so long are priesthood and
prostitution. |
This tree bears a fruit named cocho*, which is as large as
the head, and its first husk is green and two fingers thick, in
which are found certain fibers of which those people make the
ropes by which they bind their boats. Under this husk
is another, very hard and thicker than that of a nut. The second
husk they burn and make of it a powder that is useful to them. And
under said husk there is a white marrow of a finger's thickness,
which they eat fresh with meat and fish, as we do bread, and it has
the flavor of an almond, and if it were dried it would make
bread. (Poor Pigafetta had had
no fresh-baked bread for about a year).
From the center of
this marrow there flows a water which is clear and sweet and very
refreshing, and when it stands and settles it congeals and becomes
like an apple. And when they wish to make oil, they take this fruit
called cocho and put it in the sun and let said marrow putrefy and
ferment in the water, then they boil it, and it becomes
oil like
butter.
When they wish to make vinegar, they let the water of the said
cocho ferment and put it in the sun, which turns it into vinegar
like white wine. From the said fruit milk can also be made, as we proved by
experience. For we scraped the marrow, then mixed it with its own
water, and being passed through a cloth it became like goat's milk.
This kind of palm is like the palm tree that bears dates, but not so
knotty. And two of these trees will sustain
a family of ten persons."
Source: Ambeth Ocampo - Philippine Inquirer
- Magellan sailed on to Homonhon island, then to
Limasawa, where he arranged the first Christian Mass (and set in
train many of the troubles of the Philippines over the next half a
millenium). He also landed in Cebu City, and was killed in a
fracas on Mactan island with Chief Lapu-Lapu - after whom a prized
fish (the whole grouper family) and a small city have been named.
(Although the people who live there still call it
O-pon).
- Pigafetta calls the nut cocho - this
doesn't sound like the 'coco' (Spanish) = 'monkey' often given as
the origin of 'coconut'. (Magellan was Portuguese and
Pigafetta a Venetian). Perhaps in the local Suluan/Samar dialect,
the word really was 'kotcho'. Or perhaps, being
an Italian, Pigafetta was just used to the hard 'ch'.
- Similaly 'vraca' wine doesn't sound at
all like the modern 'tuba' - I suspect that word came from
Mexico - the Spanish were masters in denigrating the
'Indios' of the Philippines (who looked exactly like the
Aztecs and Incas they'd previously decimated with the help of the
Great God, smallpox) and positive pedagogues in imposing their own
language. To this day, Filipinos count ordinary things in their
own dialects, but 'alien' things, like cash, dates, times, and so
on, in Spanish.
Back to Top |
Well, I did find some...
During a
trip to look at Mangroves
just along the coast from my town, I happened to look at some coco
trees at the (back) mangrove margins.
From his very smart resort , Pansukian, Nicolas Rambeau has built a raised
timber walkway back into the Union
mangrove swamp - it makes a nice sheltered
spot to keep boats.
It also makes mangrove exploring a great deal
easier.
Lo and behold, there they were, wild coconuts,
all around us among the ordinary domesticated ones.
 Long thin husks, the nuts about the size of a
goose egg.
Unfortunately, from the vantage
point of the walkway, and after tramping around in mangrove mud, the
trees themselves, and their crowns about 30ft above us, were quite
unreachable.
The 'leaf rings' on the trunk are much
closer together than on domesticated coconuts, so presumably these
grow more slowly. They're only average height, but may be much older
than the intermixed domesticated trees.
Everything else about these trees looked much the
same as ordinary domesticated coco palms, but maybe they could do
with a closer look.
We recovered just one rotten
nut:
It was a start.
Back to Top
|
| The next day, we tried harder, got off the
walkway and down into deep squelchy mud and impenetrable mangroves,
collected some tissue samples, and (I hope) generally did the Right
Thing.
 
- The inner nut, (7cm x 4.5 cm) while not so large as a
domesticated nut (11x12) has about the same thickness (about
1cm) of flesh, but much less water - (23cc flesh in wild
coconut, 93cc in domesticated* - quadrupled). But the
water/air volume goes up from 9cc to 105cc - 12x
- Were nuts human-selected primarily for water-carrying
capacity? A fresh coconut, with its own insulation, tastes cooler,
sweeter, purer, and fresher by far than a glass or plastic bottle
of Coke, after a sun-drenched trip by boat or on foot.
- Or did people select the biggest ones as water tanks,
ballast, buoyancy aids, and food reserves on long raft or
boat trips?

- The husks are about the same length (20cm) as a
domesticated coconut, with a distinctive 'waist' so they don't
seem to have been 'selected for longer fibre length' as recently
suggested - but perhaps that writer saw a 'wild-looking' nut on a
truly Oceanic island where such a selection might have been very
useful.
- The top end is more fibre-packed (and swollen) than a
domesticated nut. Surprise, surprise - this helps it float
germinating end up. It's a perfect natural buoy, and if it wasn't
so damned edible, would probably still be used for that. A naval
architect (perhaps He was one) could not have done better:
- The centre of gravity is low down, and has its own
sub-buoyancy control (air & water)
- The whole thing is (almost) water-tight, but the top of
the inner nut and and the top of the husk have weak points to
allow leaf sprouts and roots relatively easy exit routes. The
one we cut open already has a tiny germination point, and
'vertical' striations on the husk suggest that it is just about
to split open and sprout.
- When it lands, the nut falls over - the roots have only
5cm to reach ground, instead of 5+20 if it stayed upright.
- It also rolls - back down the beach, into the water -
until the highest wave from the highest tide pitches it up onto
almost safe dry land. The husk has a definitely triangular
cross-section, but more 'rounded', without the definite 'keels'
that many domesticated nuts have.
- I don't know if these are the niu kafa type of nut
suggested by Hugh Harries as 'the ancestral, naturally-evolved, wild-type coconut,
disseminated by floating'
but I don't think he could have a more convincing model to show
his theory, even if he made it himself.
- Wild coconuts, Layaaw,
are plentiful in the mangroves. They only grow very near
the sea. Nobody bothers with them very much. Which leads to a host
of questions:
- Did they arrive by sea and not make it very far
inland?
- Exactly how far can coconuts make it inland without human
help?
- Have ancient groves been cut down years ago for new model
coconuts?
- Presumably, if they grow slower, the wood is tougher -
were they at all valued for timber?
(Coco lumber is
about all that is left now for building here).
Or are they maybe just pathologically weakened domestic
coconuts ?
Wild Nuts and Sick Nuts |
Since I first wrote this, I have been
seeing 'wild' coconuts everywhere. One was even left behind
after the owner harvested the nuts from my rented garden.
But these are genuinely sick nuts - ones that, for one
reason or another, have not developed because of a lack of
water - these are the buang
nuts - the crazy ones.
My neighbours are well aware of the quite different wild
coconuts (they call them layaaw or
payaw)
and tell me they are frequent in mangrove areas.
| Sick
Nut - (Buang) |
Wild
Nut - (Layaaw) |
 |
 |
 |
 |
The Buang
nuts have the same overall shape as the wild Layaaw
ones, but are bigger, and the waist is generally
'pinched' looking, compared with the wild nut's
somewhat elegant and shapely waist. The flesh inside
is meagre and undeveloped, while the wild nut's
flesh is just as fully developed (and delicious) as
is a good quality domestic nut's. They can be found
on the same trees as healthy nuts.
They don't germinate very well, unlike the wild
nuts. |
|
|
Finding Wild Coconuts
doesn't sound like much of a discovery, but it has
important implications for the history of mankind.
Siargao
Island might well be the ancestral home of all coconuts.
-
It's almost as if an
archaeologist, stumbling around a swamp, came across a living
ancestor of mankind - a little skinnier, and not quite as
presentable, but recognizably human, just as the wild Layaaw
is recognizably coconut.
-
Coconuts have been
floating across oceans and to and from islands like mine for
millenia.
-
Humans have also been here for a
very long time (in the Philippines' Northern Luzon (Cagayan
Valley) for about 700,000 years, and in Java, just a wee bit
south, for about 1.8 million years).
-
So coconuts and humans have had a
very long time to get acquainted.
-
Just suppose (or Just So ?)
Ms* Homo erectus, out foraging while her husband 'hunted' big game
(stegodon elephants in those days, but only tarsiers and tree
shrews now) picked up just one extra fat, large wild coconut, got
fed up with waiting for dear hubby (out with the lads again) and
left it for later - just there.
-
The long story of the
'domestication' of the coconut - one of the most miraculously
providing fruits in the world - might well have started at just
that moment.
-
If the good Ms H. erectus found some of these, a
new batch every month, and a hatchling on the ground under the
tree, she may well have put two and two together and made five.
Behold the very beginnings of agriculture!
- Did she have enough sense for that, being only, in (H
sapiens) terms, a half-wit ?
Steven Mithen ('The Prehistory of the Mind' - Thames &
Hudson 1996) doesn't seem to think so - but then he once suggested
that the classical bifacial handaxes,
made for over a million years by Homo erectus and his successors
were really phallic symbols made by displaying
males, while the women made the practical tools, as usual. He has
just about to publish a new book, claiming 'Neanderthal voices were loud, womanly and
probably highly melodic....They must have been able to communicate
complex ideas and even spirituality'. Presumably they sang
in the bath, like many semi-aquatic mammals. I would humbly
suggest they weren't communicating complex ideas and spirituality
at all, but sitting around half-sozzled and singing the Neanderthal version of 'My
Way'.
He is
also a 'classical' palaeoanthropologist who still believes apes
came out of the forests onto the wide-open savannah, where they
gambolled in the sunshine, stole meat from lions, jackals,
hyaenas, and vultures (or their truly horrendous ancestors) and,
just so, became the human beings we all love today.
-
Mr & Ms H. erectus (and later
human species strandloping along the coasts of the Indian Ocean
over the next 2 million years) had no idea they were supposed to
press on East and discover America.
-
So, just as many of them were
coming back and forth the other way. It takes no more than a
moment's calculation to show that coconuts could easily have been
subconsciously selected for larger size and fleshiness, and
transmitted by humans back West to India and Africa somewhat
quickly. Perhaps in less than the 10,000
years it has taken us to develop from the very beginnings of
classical grass agriculture to the complexities and insanities of
agricultural subsidies and monoculture crops 'designed' to survive
the death and destruction of all around them by vicious
herbicides.
-
Could Ms H erectus' finding
of the first coconut be the real origin of the story of Eden,
and the reason why only some of Ms H.e's descendants still live in
paradise, while most of them just exist in places like Birmingham,
Pittsburgh, Shanghai, Mexico City, Cairo and other hell-holes,
with not a coconut to be seen ?
Furthermore, I don't
think wild coconuts are all that rare in the Philippines - during
idle chatter with a 'professional' lady of my acquaintance, she
told me that her grandparents' graves in Toledo, South Cebu, had a
pair growing above them.
*I am not
all sure of the status of marriage that far BC, and I hate
political correctness, so I use what I understand is the term
for 'common-law' wives, or even multiple or
sequential ones.
Back
to Top | |
| We also found two other local varieties of coconut,
both known for very sweet juice, but little flesh: Neither is very
common.
  Senorita (Dwarf) in a house
yard
Kuyamis Local
growers refuse to grow modern 'dwarf' varieties of coconut, for a
very canny reason - local kids would find them easier to
steal.
Back to
Top |
(Late news - I was just told, by someone who has done
the trip, that it only takes about 6 hours from GL to Suluan by pumpboat -
but who wants to be a hero ?)
Richard Parker - March 2005 -
Last updated: Thursday, 20 October 2005
If you have any comments or corrections for
this site, please Email me at:
coconutstudio2000@yahoo.com
Internet Plagiarism Policy: I unapologetically utilize other
people's website information, on the basis that it is freely available at
no cost to anyone, nor of pecuniary value to the author. However, I do try
to give full credit and link my information to the original website so you
can follow up, and probably get the same information, and more, from the
real experts. It is simply too difficult to try and trace the original
writers of websites for permission to use their material. If I'm asked to
stop doing this, I will. I haven't enough money to be worth
suing.
Back to Coconut Studio Home
Page
|