Back to Coconut Studio Home Page
Seashore Foraging & Fishing Study

                    
Wild Coconuts 

& Antonio Pigafetta

 

After promoting my web page Coco Loco shamelessly to all and sundry, including, very presumptuously, Hugh Harries, author of Coconut Timeline and many important scientific papers, and probably the world's foremost expert on coconuts, I received a strange request from him. He asked me if I could, sometime, just pop across from my island to Suluan, the first island where Ferdinand Magellan struck land in the Philippines, described by Magellan's amanuensis, Antonio Pigafetta, as 'teeming with coconuts', and see if I could find some wild ones.

On a world map, Suluan is only within spitting distance of my Philippine island,
Siargao - about 100 miles, as the tuna swims.

I had to let him down gently. There was no way that I would risk my own 25 ft pumpboat directly to Suluan, straight north along the Philippines' continental shelf edge, right into the typhoon belt. Relying on its old and very badly-maintained 14hp motor, I might find myself washed up in Fiji or Los Angeles (without health insurance?) half a year later. 

The alternative was to take a 2 day launch and ferry trip to Cebu City, another full day ferry/bus trip to Tacloban in Leyte, an overnight ferry to Guiuan in Samar, perhaps a jeepney to the end of Samar, and hope I could pick up a boat to Suluan. Five days there, and who knows how much time back? No way.

All Magellan had to do to hit my island instead of Suluan was tack a couple of degrees more to port.

Perhaps, I replied, I might find some primordial wild coconuts in my own island,
Siargao.
(Got to placate him somehow).

Well, I did.
Source: www.multimap.com

Back to Top

But first, let's see what Antonio Pigafetta had to say about coconuts, 500 years ago. 

Pigafetta's account of coconuts was one of the first to be read in the Western world.

"In March 1521, after escaping the thieves in the place they christened Ladrones Island (Guam, much the same now as it was then - RP), they (Magellan & his scurvy crew) sailed toward Samar and anchored on an island south of Samar called Suluan

Magellan ordered tents set up by the beach. While they were resting there and fetching fresh water, a boat with nine men on board arrived. Magellan offered food and drink to the men who were ornately dressed and later presented some fabulous (to him) gifts to what he presumed were heathen primitive natives. The gifts consisted of red caps, mirrors, combs, bells and other trinkets. In return, the men gave Magellan fish, a jar (earthenware or perhaps even Oriental ceramic vessel) with palm wine they called “vraca” and bananas which Pigafetta, who was seeing them for the first time, described as "figs more than a foot long." (Probably the local variety of cooking plantains - tinduk - RP). They were also given smaller better-tasting bananas and two coconuts.

Due to the language barrier, the men spoke in sign language and made it understood that they would return in four days with rice, other types of food, and, again, coconuts. So Pigafetta describes the coconut and its uses in great detail:

Capt.Donio1.JPG (72887 bytes)"...Just as we have bread, wine, oil and vinegar in their several kinds, these people have the aforesaid things which come only from the palm trees. Wine is obtained from these in the following manner. They make an aperture into the heart of the tree at its top which is called palmito, from which is distilled along the tree a liquor like white must, which is sweet with a touch of greenness. Then they take canes as thick as a man's leg, by which they draw off this liquor, fastening them to the tree from the evening until next morning, and from morning to the evening so that the said liquor comes little by little.

This mananggutay (tuba gatherer)  is doing exactly the same as Pigafetta described 500 years ago. 
The only Western  professions so consistent in practice for so long are priesthood and prostitution.

This tree bears a fruit named cocho*, which is as large as the head, and its first husk is green and two fingers thick, in which are found certain fibers of which those people make the ropes by which they bind their boats. Under this husk is another, very hard and thicker than that of a nut. The second husk they burn and make of it a powder that is useful to them. And under said husk there is a white marrow of a finger's thickness, which they eat fresh with meat and fish, as we do bread, and it has the flavor of an almond, and if it were dried it would make bread. (Poor Pigafetta had had no fresh-baked bread for about a year).

From the center of this marrow there flows a water which is clear and sweet and very refreshing, and when it stands and settles it congeals and becomes like an apple. And when they wish to make oil, they take this fruit called cocho and put it in the sun and let said marrow putrefy and ferment in the water, then they boil it, and it becomes
oil like butter.

When they wish to make
vinegar, they let the water of the said cocho ferment and put it in the sun, which turns it into vinegar like white wine. From the said fruit milk can also be made, as we proved by experience. For we scraped the marrow, then mixed it with its own water, and being passed through a cloth it became like goat's milk. This kind of palm is like the palm tree that bears dates, but not so knotty. And two of these trees will sustain a family of ten persons."

Source: Ambeth Ocampo - Philippine Inquirer

  • Magellan sailed on to Homonhon island, then to Limasawa, where he arranged the first Christian Mass (and set in train many of the troubles of the Philippines over the next half a millenium). He also landed in Cebu City, and was killed in a fracas on Mactan island with Chief Lapu-Lapu - after whom a prized fish (the whole grouper family) and a small city have been named. (Although the people who live there still call it O-pon).
  • Pigafetta calls the nut cocho - this doesn't sound like the 'coco' (Spanish) = 'monkey' often given as the origin of 'coconut'.  (Magellan was Portuguese and Pigafetta a Venetian). Perhaps in the local Suluan/Samar dialect, the word really was 'kotcho'.  Or perhaps, being an Italian, Pigafetta was just used to the hard 'ch'.  
  • Similaly 'vraca' wine doesn't sound at all like the modern 'tuba' - I suspect that word came from Mexico - the Spanish were masters in denigrating the 'Indios' of the Philippines (who looked exactly like the Aztecs and Incas they'd previously decimated with the help of the Great God, smallpox) and positive pedagogues in imposing their own language. To this day, Filipinos count ordinary things in their own dialects, but 'alien' things, like cash, dates, times, and so on, in Spanish.

Back to Top

Well, I did find some...

During a trip
to look at Mangroves just along the coast from my town, I happened to look at some coco trees at the (back) mangrove margins. 

From his very smart resort , Pansukian, Nicolas Rambeau has built a raised timber walkway back into the Union mangrove swamp - it makes a nice sheltered spot to keep boats. 

It also makes mangrove exploring a great deal easier.

Lo and behold, there they were, wild coconuts, all around us among the ordinary domesticated ones.

Long thin husks, the nuts about the size of a goose egg.  

Unfortunately, from the vantage point of the walkway, and after tramping around in mangrove mud, the trees themselves, and their crowns about 30ft above us, were quite unreachable. 

The 'leaf rings' on the trunk are much closer together than on domesticated coconuts, so presumably these grow more slowly. They're only average height, but may be much older than the intermixed domesticated trees.

Everything else about these trees looked much the same as ordinary domesticated coco palms, but maybe they could do with a closer look.

We recovered just one rotten nut:

    

   
 It was a start.


Back to Top

The next day, we tried harder, got off the walkway and down into deep squelchy mud and impenetrable mangroves, collected some tissue samples, and (I hope) generally did the Right Thing.




  • The inner nut, (7cm x 4.5 cm) while not so large as a domesticated nut (11x12)  has about the same thickness (about 1cm) of flesh, but much less water - (23cc flesh in wild coconut,  93cc in domesticated* - quadrupled). But the water/air volume goes up from 9cc to 105cc - 12x
  • Were nuts human-selected primarily for water-carrying capacity? A fresh coconut, with its own insulation, tastes cooler, sweeter, purer, and fresher by far than a glass or plastic bottle of Coke, after a sun-drenched trip by boat or on foot.
  • Or did people select the biggest ones as water tanks, ballast, buoyancy aids, and food reserves on long raft or boat trips?


  • The husks are about the same length (20cm) as a domesticated coconut, with a distinctive 'waist' so they don't seem to have been 'selected for longer fibre length' as recently suggested - but perhaps that writer saw a 'wild-looking' nut on a truly Oceanic island where such a selection might have been very useful.

  • The top end is more fibre-packed (and swollen) than a domesticated nut. Surprise, surprise - this helps it float germinating end up. It's a perfect natural buoy, and if it wasn't so damned edible, would probably still be used for that. A naval architect (perhaps He was one) could not have done better:
    • The centre of gravity is low down, and has its own sub-buoyancy control (air & water)
    • The whole thing is (almost) water-tight, but the top of the inner nut and and the top of the husk have weak points to allow leaf sprouts and roots relatively easy exit routes. The one we cut open already has a tiny germination point, and 'vertical' striations on the husk suggest that it is just about to split open and sprout.
    • When it lands, the nut falls over - the roots have only 5cm to reach ground, instead of 5+20 if it stayed upright.
    • It also rolls - back down the beach, into the water - until the highest wave from the highest tide pitches it up onto almost safe dry land. The husk has a definitely triangular cross-section, but more 'rounded', without the definite 'keels' that many domesticated nuts have.
  • I don't know if these are the niu kafa type of nut suggested by Hugh Harries as 'the ancestral, naturally-evolved, wild-type coconut, disseminated by floating' but I don't think he could have a more convincing model to show his theory, even if he made it himself.
  • Wild coconuts, Layaaw, are plentiful in the mangroves. They only grow very near the sea. Nobody bothers with them very much. Which leads to a host of questions:
    • Did they arrive by sea and not make it very far inland?
    • Exactly how far can coconuts make it inland without human help?
    • Have ancient groves been cut down years ago for new model coconuts?
    • Presumably, if they grow slower, the wood is tougher - were they at all valued for timber? 
      (Coco lumber is about all that is left now for building here).
 
Or are they maybe just pathologically weakened domestic coconuts ?
Wild Nuts and Sick Nuts
Since I first wrote this, I have been seeing 'wild' coconuts everywhere. One was even left behind after the owner harvested the nuts from my rented garden. But these are genuinely sick nuts - ones that, for one reason or another, have not developed because of a lack of water - these are the buang nuts - the crazy ones. 

My neighbours are well aware of the quite different wild coconuts (they call them layaaw or payaw) and tell me they are frequent in mangrove areas.
Sick Nut - (Buang) Wild Nut - (Layaaw)
The Buang nuts have the same overall shape as the wild Layaaw ones, but are bigger, and the waist is generally 'pinched' looking, compared with the wild nut's somewhat elegant and shapely waist. The flesh inside is meagre and undeveloped, while the wild nut's flesh is just as fully developed (and delicious) as is a good quality domestic nut's. They can be found on the same trees as healthy nuts.
They don't germinate very well, unlike the wild nuts.

Finding Wild Coconuts doesn't sound like much of a discovery, but it has important implications for the history of mankind. 

  • If wild coconuts are here now (and nobody deliberately planted them in the swamp) then they've been here for a very, very long time. 

Siargao Island might well be the ancestral home of all coconuts.

  • It's almost as if  an archaeologist, stumbling around a swamp, came across a living ancestor of mankind - a little skinnier, and not quite as presentable, but recognizably human, just as the wild Layaaw is recognizably coconut.

  • Coconuts have been floating across oceans and to and from islands like mine for millenia.

  • Humans have also been here for a very long time (in the Philippines' Northern Luzon (Cagayan Valley) for about 700,000 years, and in Java, just a wee bit south, for about 1.8 million years).

  • So coconuts and humans have had a very long time to get acquainted. 

  • Just suppose (or Just So ?) Ms* Homo erectus, out foraging while her husband 'hunted' big game (stegodon elephants in those days, but only tarsiers and tree shrews now) picked up just one extra fat, large wild coconut, got fed up with waiting for dear hubby (out with the lads again) and left it for later - just there.

  • The long story of the 'domestication' of the coconut - one of the most miraculously providing fruits in the world - might well have started at just that moment.

  • If the good Ms H. erectus found some of these, a new batch every month, and a hatchling on the ground under the tree, she may well have put two and two together and made five. Behold the very beginnings of agriculture!
  • Did she have enough sense for that, being only, in (H sapiens) terms, a half-wit ?
     
    Steven Mithen ('The Prehistory of the Mind' - Thames & Hudson 1996) doesn't seem to think so - but then he once suggested that the classical bifacial handaxes, made for over a million years by Homo erectus and his successors were really phallic symbols made by displaying males, while the women made the practical tools, as usual. He has just about to publish a new book, claiming 'Neanderthal voices were loud, womanly and probably highly melodic....They must have been able to communicate complex ideas and even spirituality'.  Presumably they sang in the bath, like many semi-aquatic mammals. I would humbly suggest they weren't communicating complex ideas and spirituality at all, but sitting around half-sozzled and singing the Neanderthal version of 'My Way'.

    He is also a 'classical' palaeoanthropologist who still believes apes came out of the forests onto the wide-open savannah, where they gambolled in the sunshine, stole meat from lions, jackals, hyaenas, and vultures (or their truly horrendous ancestors) and, just so, became the human beings we all love today. 

  • Mr & Ms H. erectus (and later human species strandloping along the coasts of the Indian Ocean over the next 2 million years) had no idea they were supposed to press on East and discover America. 

  • So, just as many of them were coming back and forth the other way. It takes no more than a moment's calculation to show that coconuts could easily have been subconsciously selected for larger size and fleshiness, and transmitted by humans back West to India and Africa somewhat quickly. Perhaps in less than the 10,000 years it has taken us to develop from the very beginnings of classical grass agriculture to the complexities and insanities of agricultural subsidies and monoculture crops 'designed' to survive the death and destruction of all around them by vicious herbicides.

  • Could Ms H erectus' finding of the first coconut be the real origin of the story of Eden, and the reason why only some of Ms H.e's descendants still live in paradise, while most of them just exist in places like Birmingham, Pittsburgh, Shanghai, Mexico City, Cairo and other hell-holes, with not a coconut to be seen ?

Furthermore, I don't think wild coconuts are all that rare in the Philippines - during idle chatter with a 'professional' lady of my acquaintance, she told me that her grandparents' graves in Toledo, South Cebu, had a pair growing above them.

*I am not all sure of the status of marriage that far BC,  and I hate political correctness,  so I use what I understand is the term for 'common-law' wives, or  even multiple or sequential ones.

Back to Top

We also found two other local varieties of coconut, both known for very sweet juice, but little flesh: Neither is very common.


Senorita (Dwarf)
in a house yard

Kuyamis     
                                                                                                                                 
Local growers refuse to grow modern 'dwarf' varieties of coconut, for a very canny reason - local kids would find them easier to steal.

Back to Top

(Late news - I was just told, by someone who has done the trip, that it only takes about 6 hours from GL to Suluan by pumpboat - but who wants to be a hero ?)


Richard Parker - March 2005 - Last updated: Thursday, 20 October 2005
If you have any comments or corrections for this site, please Email me at: coconutstudio2000@yahoo.com

Internet Plagiarism Policy: I unapologetically utilize other people's website information, on the basis that it is freely available at no cost to anyone, nor of pecuniary value to the author. However, I do try to give full credit and link my information to the original website so you can follow up, and probably get the same information, and more, from the real experts. It is simply too difficult to try and trace the original writers of websites for permission to use their material. If I'm asked to stop doing this, I will. I haven't enough money to be worth suing.

Back to Coconut Studio Home Page